THE recent social media uproar, sparked by Prof Tajuddin Abdullah’s thoughtful and courageous critique, sheds light on a troubling reality: the rise of so-called “profesor kangkung” in Malaysia’s intellectual landscape. This issue should alarm all citizens concerned about the country’s future.
These people, who are supposed to be society’s guiding lights, have instead become symbols of the erosion of integrity and trust in academic and public life. Worse, their unsolicited and unqualified opinions flood social media, spreading confusion and division when we need clear, scholarly voices to navigate complex national challenges.
The problem runs deep. When the president of the government-appointed National Council of Professors – an institution meant to embody intellectual rigour and public service – faces charges of misappropriating public funds, the moral authority of our academic institutions and national councils is seriously undermined. These bodies should act as the conscience of the nation, offering wisdom and insight, but they are increasingly aligned with personal or political gain rather than the well-being of the Malaysian people. How have we reached this point? And why is this allowed to continue on the Madani government’s watch?
Equally concerning is the focus on divisive, reactionary issues like halal certification, which have only recently sparked conflict. Malaysia was once a model of a harmonious, multiracial, and multireligious society. Halal issues never caused such widespread contention. We progressed steadily, building infrastructure, improving education, and advancing industry, nearly achieving advanced-nation status. Yet now, instead of prioritising urgent matters like economic growth, education reform, and technological progress, we are entangled in emotional, short-sighted debates that only serve to divide Malaysians.
The prime minister’s response to these controversies is particularly troubling. Rather than offering a rational, unifying perspective, he appears to be pandering to populist sentiments, aligning with emotional reactions instead of encouraging thoughtful dialogue. This is a dangerous approach. A leader’s role is to rise above the fray, offering wisdom and guidance that prioritises the nation’s long-term well-being, not to fuel divisive rhetoric that fractures our society.
At this critical juncture, we must collectively demand a return to rational discourse, intellectual honesty, and focus on the real issues facing our country. Signs of regression are already visible, as we fall behind our Asean neighbours in areas where we once led. Singapore, Thailand, and even Vietnam are surging ahead in innovation, agriculture, and governance while we remain bogged down in debates that should have been resolved long ago through mutual respect and understanding.
If we continue on this path, distracted by trivial issues rather than confronting our real challenges, we will slide irreversibly backward. The future of our nation hangs in the balance. Will we allow ourselves to be consumed by distractions and self-serving academics, or will we insist on visionary leadership that addresses our most pressing concerns – economic resilience, educational reform, and societal unity?
We must demand more from our intellectuals, our leaders, and ourselves. Malaysia was once admired for its ability to navigate complexity with grace, forging ahead despite its diversity. We need that spirit now more than ever. Our future depends on it. – September 15, 2024.
* Ghazally Ismail reads The Malaysian Insight.
* This is the opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insight. Article may be edited for brevity and clarity.
