Malaysia Oversight

IGC, Cobbold back Sabah, Sarawak’s claim, says deputy speaker

By FMT in September 29, 2025 – Reading time 2 minute
IGC, Cobbold back Sabah, Sarawak’s claim, says deputy speaker


a774e02b idris buang and azhar harun tile pic 290925
Sarawak deputy speaker Idris Buang (left) pointed out to former speaker Azhar Harun that the IGC states that the proportion of seats allocated to Sarawak and Sabah should not be reduced.
PETALING JAYA:

The Intergovernmental Committee Report, which was incorporated in the Malaysia Agreement 1963, lends credence to the clam by Sabah and Sarawak to one-third of the total number of parliamentary seats, says the Sarawak deputy speaker.

Idris Buang said the IGC was made in line with recommendations by the Cobbold Commission when formulating the framework of the Federal Constitution to include the interests and safeguards of the Borneo states.

The Cobbold Commission was set up to determine whether the people of Sabah and Sarawak backed the proposal to create the federation of Malaysia, which also comprised Singapore.

Idris said the spirit of the formation of Malaysia, as far as the Borneo states were concerned, was cemented by the emphasis made by the commission that Sabah and Sarawak should be equal partners to Malaya.

The Cobbold Commission would not allow Malaya to “dominate absolutely”, Idris said.

“It is in this respect that the seats in Parliament were increased (on formation of Malaysia) from 104 to 159, of which 24 were allocated to Sarawak, 16 to Sabah and 15 to Singapore,” he was quoted as saying, adding that this distribution gave the total number of seats for Singapore and the Borneo states at 55, or 35%.

Idris said the IGC also stated that the proportion of seats allocated respectively to Sarawak and Sabah should not be reduced, except by reason of the granting of seats to any other new state.

“The keywords are ‘should not be reduced’. This is to reflect the emphasis given by the Cobbold Commission, which underscores the aforesaid spirit of formation of Malaysia that the Borneo states should not be subjected to any domination by Malaya.

“It is a form of safeguard to the interests of the Borneo states.”

Idris said that former Dewan Rakyat speaker Azhar Harun was therefore “simply fallacious and sadly wrong” by claiming otherwise.

On Sept 24, Azhar said there was nothing in the MA63, the Federal Constitution, the Malaysia Act 1963 as well as the IGC report that specified that Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore were to occupy 35% of the seats in the Dewan Rakyat.

Azhar also said there was no clause stipulating that in the event Singapore were to separate from Malaysia, its seats must be given to Sabah and Sarawak.

Idris went on to say that as MA63 was now part of the Federal Constitution by virtue of the 2022 amendments, it provided the “legal basis” for all the claims by Sarawak and Sabah.

Yesterday, a senior Gabungan Parti Sarawak leader disputed Azhar’s take on the matter.

Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah said Azhar had not undertaken deeper research into the historical agreements and conventions leading to Malaysia’s formation.



Source link