Malaysia Oversight

Flex marks the spot? | The Star

By theStar in April 27, 2025 – Reading time 6 minute
Flex marks the spot? | The Star


“DO I have to die in the office to go to heaven?”

Hafiz, 27, who declines to give his full name, instantly sneers when asked about the new push to return fully to the office that his company is implementing.

Hafiz works in digital marketing, first entering the job market amid the shift towards remote work or working from home (WFH) mode during the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, and now struggles to adjust to returning to the office full-time.

Especially when, he contends, he can do his job perfectly fine from anywhere and at any time.

“Everything can be done through the Internet now, right?”

But working trends show the opposite, as many companies around the world are now pushing for workers to return to the office (RTO).

HR media platform People Matters Global reported in June 2024 that more than half of the workers in Malaysia said their employers expect them to be in the office more frequently. And the percentage of employees in Malaysia facing the call to RTO is 17% higher than the global average.

Experts say this is due to concerns about productivity, better teamwork, and fostering company culture. However, they note that WFH is not going to fully go away, as many employees, especially the younger generation, still greatly prioritise work flexibility. Instead, the experts observe that the labour market may be moving towards a more hybrid model as a compromise.

The government has also signalled a legislative shift with the introduction of amendments to the Employment Act 1955 that allow employees to formally request for flexible work arrangements due to caregiving responsibilities for children or aged parents.

Recalibration, not retreat

Human resources agency TalentCorp’s group chief executive officer Thomas Mathew says they have observed a shift back to working from the office, but adds that many are also moving towards a hybrid model.

“I would describe this shift as a recalibration, not a retreat. Many organisations are moving towards hybrid models, that is, balancing physical collaboration with flexible hours or locations.

“Remote work is not vanishing, rather it’s becoming more deliberate,” he tells the Sunday Star.

Malaysia HR Forum co-founder Arulkumar Singaraveloo adds that this recalibration is more about companies re-adapting their workplace strategies to a post-pandemic world.

A 2024 survey by the Malay-sian Employers Federation (MEF) titled “Flexible Working Arrangement: Assessing Practices and Perspectives of Private Sector Employers in Malaysia” indicated that 70.5% of companies that took part in the survey have implemented some form of hybrid work models, with some providing flexibility in working hours and others offering flexibility in the workplace.

“Flexible working arrangements (FWA) will continue to be practised, especially with the introduction of FWAs in the Employment Act 1955 with effect from Jan 1, 2024.

“But on-site work remains the norm for many employers,” says MEF president Datuk Dr Syed Hussain Syed Husman.

Speaking on the findings of the MEF survey, Mathew says it suggests that companies are tailoring flexibility to meet sectoral needs rather than completely abandoning FWA.

Many Malaysian employers shy away from full remote work as they believe it leads to decreased productivity, says Syed Hussain.

“They struggle to monitor employee performance effectively when employees are on remote work and working from home.”

Employers have also stated that worksite interactions can foster better teamwork and mentorship, and inculcate workplace culture more effectively, he says.

They believe that “remote work and WFH will, in the long run, weaken employee engagement and loyalty, making it harder to maintain a strong organisational culture,” he says.

There are also some concerns about cybersecurity and data confidentiality risks with remote work, especially if employees use personal devices, he adds.

Not just a ‘nice to have’ perk

However, Syed Hussain warns that this push for RTO may lead to higher attrition rates and reduced innovation among younger employees.

“Younger workers increasingly demand flexibility. The reluctance to embrace remote and WFH risks alienating top talents.

“Employees who experienced remote work and WFH often view full office mandates as a step backward, leading to higher attrition.

“Younger candidates openly reject traditional office setups, forcing some firms to relax policies for early career roles,” says Syed Hussain.

Syed Hussain: 'MEF believes that implementation of remote and hybrid work should be flexible and tailored to individual organisational context, rather than adopting a one-size-fits-all policy.'Syed Hussain: ‘MEF believes that implementation of remote and hybrid work should be flexible and tailored to individual organisational context, rather than adopting a one-size-fits-all policy.’

Mathew says survey data shows that nearly half of Gen Z (49%) and millennials (47%) in Malaysia would rather resign than accept inflexible, office-bound work models.

At the same time, he says, Malaysian workers are clocking longer hours at 17% above the global average.

“It is clear that people want flexibility, but not at the expense of balance,” he says.

But it’s not just younger workers like millennials and Gen Z who value work flexibility; Arulkumar says this is also true among dual-income households and working parents.

“For many, flexibility is no longer viewed as a ‘nice to have’ perk but a fundamental job requirement.

“Reduced commuting time, better work-life balance, and greater control over one’s schedule have led to higher satisfaction levels, particularly among employees with caregiving responsibilities.

“Balancing operational needs with individual flexibility will be crucial for talent retention moving forward,” says Arulkumar.

There is a growing resistance to inflexible mandates, he adds, and those in high demand or mobile professions are willing to resign or decline offers from companies that do not accommodate their work-life expectations.

This is especially true in sectors driven by intellectual or digital output, says Arulkumar, as performance in these industries are usually measured by results and deliverables rather than visibility at the office.

“Forcing physical presence in such sectors may backfire, as these professionals often have multiple job options and value autonomy over structure,” he says.

Hafiz could become one such example; his company issued an RTO mandate last year, and he has been searching for a suitable new job for the last few months.

“It’s quite mixed,” he says, in terms of employers offering work flexibility, “but I really want to find a WFH job.”

It is not just Gen Z that cares about flexible working arrangements; some dual-income households and working parents also value flexibility with their work, says Arulkumar. — IZZRAFIQ ALIAS/The StarIt is not just Gen Z that cares about flexible working arrangements; some dual-income households and working parents also value flexibility with their work, says Arulkumar. — IZZRAFIQ ALIAS/The Star

‘Isn’t it normal to work from office?’

Hafiz’s job is online-based, so his work can be done remotely, but Syed Hussain says some jobs simply require the workers’ physical presence at the workplace, such as in manufacturing, retail, and customer service.

Arulkumar also adds that legacy industries like banking or those with a hierarchical or compliance-heavy environment are most likely to want workers back in the office too.

Employees do understand the concerns of their employers; 28-year-old Yvonne Chong works in accounting and her company has mandated RTO since 2022.

“Isn’t working from an office normal? My job also requires me to handle sensitive numbers sometimes for our clients, so of course, I have to do the work on site.

“I don’t mind having to go back to the office because I understand why they’re asking for it for my job,” she says.

The different situations for various jobs mean that there cannot be a one-size-fits-all approach to remote work, says Syed Hussain.

“MEF advocates a balanced approach that considers both employer and employee needs on the subject of remote work and WFH.

“MEF believes that implementation of remote and hybrid work should be flexible and tailored to individual organisational context, rather than adopting a one-size-fits-all policy,” he says.

TalentCorp’s conversations with employers have also reinforced that the future of work is hybrid by design.

“That is why under Budget 2025, the government has introduced an additional 50% tax deduction on costs related to implementing FWA.

“This is a one-time incentive, available from Jan 1, 2025, to Dec 31, 2027, and demonstrates a commitment to supporting this transformation at scale,” says Mathew.

Arulkumar also says he believes the hybrid model will dominate the future of work in Malaysia, a sentiment which Mathew says is reinforced by TalentCorp’s conversations with employers in the country.

“Remote and hybrid work models are here to stay.

“The question now is how we adapt these models to drive productivity, equity, and national competitiveness,” says Mathew.



Source link